top of page
  • Writer's pictureOmid Moludy

A Penetrative Scrutiny of Richard Rohr's "The Universal Christ"

Updated: Nov 12, 2023

A Penetrative Scrutiny of Richard Rohr's "The Universal Christ": A Contemplative Engagement with Classical Christian Theology and Philosophical Exegesis

By Omid Moludy


In the diversely tessellated arena of theological discourse, Richard Rohr's seminal opus, "The Universal Christ," conspicuously stands as a pivoting linchpin that endeavours to realign, or indeed metamorphose, long-standing doctrinal paradigms within the tapestry of contemporary Christian thought (Rohr, 2019, p.23). Emanating from the Franciscan tradition, Rohr introduces an audacious hermeneutical enterprise; one that purports to both subvert and transcend the hallowed bastions of classical Christological orthodoxy. (Augustine, 1991, p.118) Yet, can Rohr's treatise withstand the stringent scrutiny afforded by the millennially refined tenets that constitute the bedrock of traditional Christian metaphysics, epistemology, and soteriology?

The quintessential purpose of this essay is to engage in a rigorous interrogation of Rohr's conceptual apparatus, adumbrating it against the indelible and immutable cornerstones that undergird classical Christian theology. Through this analytical crucible, we shall attempt to elucidate the complex interplay of consonances and dissonances emergent between Rohr's proposal and the venerated corpus of Christian dogmatic tradition. Furthermore, this exploration aims to shed light on potential lacunae or epistemic gaps that may lurk within the crevices of Rohr's theological tapestry, thereby affording the reader an encompassing purview into the efficacy, or potential deficit, of his theological conjectures.

Drawing upon the wellspring of Augustinian, Thomistic, and Neo-Platonic insights, our critical analysis will extend beyond mere doctrinal comparison, delving into the metaphysical and existential implications intrinsic to any discourse purporting to expound upon the ineffable nature of the Christ. Thus, this treatise will unfold as a multidimensional critique, establishing a dialectical conversation between Rohr and the luminary figures of classical Christian thought.

I. The Multifaceted Milieu of Richard Rohr: A Nexus of Influences and Aspirations

Richard Rohr, a man who serves as a crucible for a diverse array of spiritual, cultural, and intellectual influences, has emerged as an ineluctable pillar in the edifice of contemporary Christian spirituality. (Rohr, 2019) His ambit of influences is not myopically confined to Western Christendom; rather, it spans across an eclectic array of traditions, thereby imbuing his hermeneutical approach with a distinctive cosmopolitan texture. It is this complex mosaic of insights that Rohr synthesises in his magnum opus, "The Universal Christ," an oeuvre that emanates from a profound existential yearning—perhaps even an angst—to liberate the Christological archetype from the mire of its historical and ecclesiastical accretions. (Rahner, 1978, p105)

Rohr's intellectual endeavour is not merely an academic exercise, but is imbued with a catalytic potency; it has precipitated a seismic epistemological and ontological shift in the way Christianity conceives of itself, both in its existential immediacy and its eschatological teleology. In effect, Rohr's treatise posits a reimagining of the Christian narrative, compelling a reconsideration of its ontological presuppositions and its eschatological horizon.

In tackling the weighty subject of the Christ, Rohr purposefully disengages from parochial doctrinal paradigms that have long dominated ecclesiastical dogmatics. He strives to extricate Christology from what he perceives as its historical ensnarement, encompassing the Christ figure in a more universal, perhaps even cosmic, framework. Yet, one must pause and ponder whether this expansive reimagination, this stretching of boundaries, stays faithful to the classical Christian intellectual traditions. Does it reflect an authentic interpretive evolution, or does it unwittingly dilute the metaphysical specificity and soteriological gravity that classical theologians like Augustine, Aquinas, and the Cappadocian Fathers have painstakingly delineated?

Thus, as we proceed in our analytical journey, we will appraise Rohr's theological postulations through the lens of these venerable figures, thereby attempting to disentangle the nuanced web of synergies and disjunctures that arise when juxtaposed against the intricate tapestry of classical Christian thought.

II. A Synoptic Overview of "The Universal Christ": Transcending the Conventional Parameters of Christian Dogmatics

In his magnum opus, "The Universal Christ," Richard Rohr embarks on a labyrinthine intellectual odyssey, traversing an extensive tableau of interconnected theological, philosophical, and soteriological themes. At the epicentre of his discourse lies the concept of the 'Universal Christ'—an expansive, almost cosmic, rendition of the Christ figure that seeks to transcend the parochial strictures traditionally imposed by ecclesiastical dogmatics. Beyond this central fulcrum, Rohr’s intellectual landscape meanders through the arcane terrains of non-dualistic thought, eschewing Manichean binaries in favour of a more nuanced, holistic epistemology. Furthermore, his theological articulations exude an ecumenical ethos, embracing a posture of openness and inclusivity towards interfaith dialogue—a decidedly postmodern trait that markedly diverges from classical exclusivist paradigms. (Rohr, 2019)

Rohr’s treatise thus unfurls as a panoramic vista that audaciously challenges the doctrinal confines and ontological premises long sacralised within Christian thought. He casts a wide net, seeking to incorporate a plethora of perspectives that do not merely supplement, but at times subvert, traditional theological viewpoints. Yet herein lies the crux that invites scrupulous examination: does Rohr's expansive hermeneutical endeavour harmonise with the core tenets of classical Christian thought, or does it, in its quest for universality, dilute or even efface the particularities and complexities that have been meticulously explicated by theological luminaries such as Augustine, Aquinas, and Calvin?

For a comprehensive understanding, it becomes imperative to situate Rohr’s work within the broader contours of Christian philosophical and theological traditions. We must assess how Rohr's interpretative novelties interact with classical Christian orthodoxy, specifically in areas concerning the nature and work of Christ, the theological underpinnings of non-dualism, and the validity and boundaries of interfaith engagement. Only through this rigorous comparative analysis can we fully discern the extent to which Rohr’s vision either dovetails with, or deviates from, the theological verities that constitute the bedrock of Christian tradition.

III. Classical Christian Theology: The Bedrock of Enduring Verities and Intellectual Rigour

Classical Christian theology stands as an edifice painstakingly constructed through millennia of rigorous intellectual exertion and fervent spiritual contemplation. Its foundations are firmly embedded in the hermeneutical soil tilled by monumental theological and philosophical luminaries such as Augustine of Hippo (Augustine, 1991, p. 88) Thomas Aquinas (Aquinas, 1947, p 212)., and Martin Luther (Luther, 1957, p84), each contributing their own distinctive stratum of exegetical richness to the overarching theological corpus. At the core of this monumental edifice reside seminal, non-negotiable precepts—the Trinity, the Incarnation, and the Atonement—which have perdured through the vicissitudes of history as inviolable bulwarks of the Christian theo-ontological discourse.

The doctrine of the Trinity, epitomising a divine mystery encapsulated within the very nature of God, has profoundly shaped the metaphysical texture of Christian thought. It posits a harmonious yet complex unity of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, each distinct yet consubstantial, forming an unbroken perichoresis that evokes the deepest wellsprings of Christian ontology. The Incarnation, similarly, proffers a revolutionary convergence of divine and human natures in the person of Jesus Christ, serving as the seminal focal point for soteriological discourse, and thus acting as a cornerstone for the edifice of Christian redemptive theology. The concept of Atonement, meanwhile, elucidates the cosmic scale of the salvific act undertaken by Christ, providing a soteriological framework that explicates the reconciliation of fallen humanity with its divine Creator.

These foundational dogmas coalesce to form a coherent and unified theological tapestry that has withstood the test of time, weathering the tempests of heretical subversions, intellectual scepticism, and cultural shifts. The gravitas of these enduring verities serves as the gauge by which all subsequent theological innovations and interpretations, including those proffered by Richard Rohr, must inevitably be measured.

As we subsequently delve into an analytical juxtaposition of Rohr’s "The Universal Christ" vis-à-vis these classical theological fulcrums, the prime objective will be to discern whether Rohr’s hermeneutical venture serves as a symbiotic enhancement to traditional Christian thought, or whether it engenders a theological dissonance, thereby challenging the integrity of the classical tenets it purports to reinterpret. By anchoring our critique within this venerable framework, we aim to furnish a nuanced understanding of Rohr's theological position in relation to the indelible and immutable substratum of classical Christian thought.

IV. A Scrutinising Critique of "The Universal Christ": The Harmonies and Dissonances with Classical Christological and Soteriological Paradigms (Hick, 1993, p. 67)

As we interrogate Richard Rohr's conceptualisation of a 'universal Christ,' it becomes manifestly apparent that his theological framework evinces a significant divergence from the hallowed tenets of classical Christian orthodoxy. This disjuncture raises numerous questions that require critical scrutiny, especially when viewed through the prismatic lens of perennial Christological and soteriological paradigms as espoused by figures such as Augustine, Aquinas, and Luther.

Firstly, Rohr's espousal of non-dualistic epistemology and ontology strikes an incongruent chord with the inherently dualistic frameworks that have been entrenched within classical Christian thought. (Tillich, 1991, p. 126.) Traditional Christian metaphysics, particularly as elucidated within Thomistic and Augustinian discourses, often operate within a dualistic schema that differentiates between Creator and creation, spirit and flesh, and the sacred and the profane. In stark contrast, Rohr's non-dualistic stance seems to blur these ontological and epistemological boundaries, thereby creating a conceptual dissonance that calls into question the validity of such a hermeneutic within a Christian context.

Secondly, Rohr's elaboration on alternative theories of atonement constitutes a further point of divergence from classical soteriology. Traditional Christian thought maintains a view of the Atonement as a divinely ordained, uniquely efficacious act of redemptive sacrifice, one that stands as an ontological necessity for the reconciliation of humanity with its Creator. Rohr's broadening of atonement theory, while novel, tends to efface the gravity and specificity of Christ's redemptive act, thereby challenging the soteriological exclusivity that has long been a linchpin of classical Christian theology.

Lastly, Rohr’s sanguine and inclusive approach towards interfaith dialogue raises substantive concerns when contrasted with the ontological exclusivity that pervades classical Christian soteriology. For centuries, Christian doctrine has asserted the uniqueness and absoluteness of Christ as the sole avenue for eternal salvation. Rohr's cosmopolitanism seems to muddle this exclusivist claim, introducing a level of religious pluralism that could be seen as compromising the uniqueness of the Christian salvific narrative.

In conclusion, while Rohr's "The Universal Christ" is undoubtedly a theological tour-de-force that aims to stretch the boundaries of Christian thought, its potential incompatibilities with classical Christian tenets cannot be glossed over. A scrupulous examination reveals a series of dissonances that indicate a need for caution in assimilating Rohr’s contributions uncritically into the repository of Christian thought. As such, it becomes imperative to engage in further theological reflection, informed by the luminous heritage of classical Christian philosophy and theology, to fully grasp the contours, potentials, and limitations of Rohr's ambitious theological project.

V. Comparative Theology: The Symbiotic Dialogues and Tensions Between Mystical Spirituality and Classical Doctrinal Foundations

Despite the palpable dissonances between Richard Rohr's theological construct and classical Christian paradigms, there exist certain interstitial spaces where a dialogue appears not only possible but also potentially enriching. These spaces are most manifest within the domain of mystical spirituality, a facet of religious experience that transcends mere dogmatic assertions and delves into the realms of existential encounter and transformative union with the Divine.

Rohr's work exudes a mystical sensibility that finds echoes in the experiential theology of classical Christian mystics such as Meister Eckhart, John of the Cross, and Teresa of Ávila. His emphasis on direct, transformative experiences of the Divine offers a potential harmonisation with the apophatic and cataphatic traditions of Christian mysticism, which have always concerned themselves with the ineffable and the transcendent. Herein lies the potential for a symbiotic dialogue that could serve to augment our understanding of both Rohr's universal Christ concept and the mystical core of classical Christian thought. (Pannenberg, 1991, p. 126)

However, this interstice of compatibility is not without its complications. The breadth of Rohr’s mystical emphasis—so expansive that it ventures into the realms of interfaith dialogue and non-dualistic metaphysics—begs the question of its complete compatibility with classical Christian orthodoxy. The capaciousness of Rohr’s mystical vision raises the spectre of syncretism, potentially diluting or even overshadowing the specificity and uniqueness of the Christian mystical tradition, as articulated by the likes of Pseudo-Dionysius, Bernard of Clairvaux, and other spiritual luminaries.

Furthermore, the possible concord between Rohr's mystical leanings and classical mysticism must be evaluated within the broader landscape of doctrinal commitments that define Christian orthodoxy. Mystical experiences, as profound as they may be, are traditionally circumscribed and interpreted within the bounds of established doctrine—bounds that Rohr seems to stretch, if not outright transcend. (Kierkegaard, 1992), p. 58)

In sum, while the arena of mystical spirituality presents fertile ground for constructive engagement between Rohr's innovative theological framework and the rich tapestry of classical Christian theology, such engagement is fraught with complexities. It necessitates a nuanced, discerning approach that can differentiate between elements that are genuinely complementary and those that pose a challenge to the foundational verities of the Christian faith. Only through such a judicious comparative theology can we adequately gauge the real extent of harmonies and dissonances between Rohr's "The Universal Christ" and the enduring bedrock of classical Christian thought.

VI. Controversies and Debates: The Theological Chiaroscuro Elicited by "The Universal Christ" within the Christian Ecclesial Landscape

The theological vistas opened by Richard Rohr's "The Universal Christ" have ignited a veritable crucible of intellectual and ecclesial contention, eliciting a gamut of responses that range from enthusiastic acclamation to rigorous critique. This discursive ferment indicates the work's profound implications for the Christian ecclesial community (McGrath, 2010, 207), and, more broadly, its ability to catalyse paradigmatic shifts within the field of modern Christian theology and philosophy.

On one hand, Rohr's magnum opus has garnered strident endorsements, particularly from those within progressive theological circles who find in his work a resounding affirmation of their own leanings towards inclusivity, interfaith engagement, and a reconsideration of established dogmas. These proponents argue that Rohr's novel hermeneutics provide a much-needed palliative for a Church often perceived as rigidly dogmatic or exclusionary, enabling it to better engage with the religious pluralism and philosophical complexities of the contemporary world.

On the other hand, the book has also been the locus of assiduous critique from a variety of scholars and theologians who are deeply ensconced in classical Christian orthodoxy. These critics raise incisive questions pertaining to the theological viability of Rohr's 'universal Christ' construct, particularly its congruence—or lack thereof—with core tenets such as the Trinity, the Incarnation, and the Atonement. Furthermore, his non-dualistic approaches and ecumenical impulses are scrutinised for their potential to erode the specificity and exclusivity that are integral to classical Christian soteriology. (Barth, 2004, p.32)

Amidst this dialectical interplay of affirmation and negation, "The Universal Christ" functions as a fulcrum that magnifies deep-seated tensions within Christian theology—tensions that have existential import for both individual believers and ecclesial communities. Such polemics highlight the ongoing need for a scrupulous and balanced hermeneutical analysis that can sift through the diverse theological claims and counterclaims, assessing their merit in relation to the enduring landmarks of classical Christian thought.

Thus, far from being a matter of mere academic disquisition, the controversies and debates stirred by "The Universal Christ" bear testament to the work's far-reaching implications, challenging the Church to a rigorous self-examination and potentially reformative dialogue. This ecclesial introspection, undertaken in the crucible of spirited discourse, constitutes an indispensable exercise for discerning the path forward in an increasingly complex theological landscape.

VII. Implications for Contemporary Christianity: The Seismic Shifts and Reconfiguration of Theological and Doctrinal Paradigms

The theological ruminations inspired by Richard Rohr's "The Universal Christ" reverberate far beyond the confines of academic treatises or ecclesial debates. Indeed, the work casts a long shadow on the landscape of contemporary Christian theology and praxis, (Moltmann,1974, p.315) precipitating the need for a wholesale re-examination of the foundational dogmas and doctrinal rigidity that have often characterised the Church's self-understanding.

One of the most salient implications of Rohr's treatise lies in its challenge to exclusivist soteriological frameworks. The notion of a 'universal Christ' nudges the ecclesial community towards a broader conception of salvation that transcends the limitations of denominational particularities and doctrinal insularity. Should such a view gain traction, it could catalyse a radical reimagining of the Church's mission and evangelistic approach, one that is more accommodating of religious diversity and nuanced spiritual experiences.

Moreover, the work's robust engagement with non-dualistic thought forms poses serious questions for the dualistic metaphysical assumptions that have long underpinned Christian cosmology and anthropology. The incorporation of non-dualistic perspectives could lead to a more integrative theology that embraces the complexity of human existence and the interconnectedness of all creation. This shift could have practical ramifications, encouraging a more holistic approach to social justice issues, ecological stewardship, and interfaith relations.

Additionally, Rohr's emphasis on mystical spirituality opens avenues for renewed liturgical and devotional expressions within Christian communities. By foregrounding the importance of existential and transformative encounters with the Divine, the Church might find resources for revitalising its sacramental practices and spiritual disciplines, potentially drawing upon a rich tradition of Christian mysticism that has often been relegated to the margins of ecclesial life.

However, these transformative possibilities come laden with challenges that should not be underestimated. A hasty embrace of Rohr's theological novelties risks engendering a dilution of doctrinal integrity, potentially leading to a syncretistic mélange that muddies the waters of Christian identity. Any recalibration of long-standing dogmas must, therefore, be undertaken with circumspection, fully cognisant of the weight of tradition and the wisdom enshrined within classical Christian orthodoxy.

In conclusion, the implications of "The Universal Christ" for contemporary Christianity are both profound and complex. The work serves as a catalyst for reconfiguring the theological and doctrinal paradigms that shape the Church's self-understanding and praxis. Yet, it also raises probing questions that necessitate careful reflection, sober judgment, and ongoing dialogue within the broad tapestry of Christian thought and tradition. As such, Rohr's magnum opus stands as a watershed moment in the evolution of Christian theology, one that demands both engagement and scrutiny as the Church navigates its path in an increasingly pluralistic and complex world.

VIII. Conclusion: The Tension and Synthesis Between Innovation and Tradition in Engaging with "The Universal Christ"

In summation, Richard Rohr's "The Universal Christ" functions as both a catalyst and a crucible within the landscape of Christian theological discourse. On one hand, it introduces groundbreaking paradigms that enrich and expand our understanding of the Divine, prompting a re-evaluation of long-standing theological presuppositions and enlivening the dialogical arena with its novel inquisitions. On the other hand, it presents a formidable challenge to the axiomatic tenets and doctrinal certainties that have shaped classical Christian thought for centuries. (Augustine, 1991, p130)

While the work's innovative character and existential immediacy might captivate the contemporary theological imagination, these very attributes also incur the scepticism and scrutiny of those committed to the intellectual and spiritual legacies bequeathed by theological luminaries such as Augustine, Aquinas, and Luther. As a consequence, "The Universal Christ" stands as a litmus test for the adaptability and resilience of classical Christian theology, questioning its capacity to address and integrate novel religious and philosophical insights without relinquishing its foundational convictions.

In this light, the audacious inquisitions set forth by Rohr do not diminish but rather accentuate the ongoing relevance of classical Christian theology. They serve as a poignant reminder that even well-entrenched religious traditions must be prepared to engage with the seismic shifts occurring in the broader theological and philosophical milieu. The potential for creative tension and constructive dialogue between the novel and the traditional, between the progressive and the orthodox, suggests that rather than being anachronistic, classical Christian theology remains indelibly pertinent, capable of informing and being informed by contemporary religious thought.

Hence, the tensions and challenges elicited by "The Universal Christ" do not mark an insurmountable schism but rather a fertile ground for theological exploration and ecclesial reflection. The book urges both the proponents and critics within the Christian community to venture beyond their comfort zones, compelling them to converse, critique, and perhaps even converge, in a spirited quest for theological verity and spiritual authenticity. As such, Rohr's work serves not merely as a milestone but as a navigational marker, providing both an impetus and a challenge for the ongoing journey of faith within an ever-evolving religious landscape.



Augustine of Hippo. 1991. "Confessions." Translated by Henry Chadwick. Oxford University Press.

Aquinas, Thomas. 1947. "Summa Theologica." Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Benzinger Bros.

Luther, Martin. 1957. "The Bondage of the Will." Translated by J. I. Packer and O. R. Johnston. Fleming H. Revell.

Rohr, Richard. 2019. "The Universal Christ: How a Forgotten Reality Can Change Everything We See, Hope For, and Believe." Convergent Books.

Rahner, Karl. 1978. "Foundations of Christian Faith: An Introduction to the Idea of Christianity." Translated by William V. Dych. Crossroad Publishing Company.

Tillich, Paul. 1951. "Systematic Theology." University of Chicago Press.

Hick, John. 1993. "The Metaphor of God Incarnate: Christology in a Pluralistic Age." Westminster John Knox Press.

Moltmann, Jürgen. 1974. "The Crucified God: The Cross of Christ as the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology." Translated by R. A. Wilson and John Bowden. SCM Press.

Kierkegaard, Søren. 1992. "Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments." Translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton University Press.

Barth, Karl. 2004. "Church Dogmatics." Edited by G. W. Bromiley and T. F. Torrance. T&T Clark.

Pannenberg, Wolfhart. 1991. "Systematic Theology." Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

McGrath, Alister. 2010. "Christian Theology: An Introduction." Wiley-Blackwell.

221 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page